In the competitive landscape of remote talent acquisition, both Arc.Dev and Teilur Talent stand out as significant players in the outsourcing domain. While Arc.Dev has established itself as a notable provider, Teilur Talent is gaining recognition for its focus on streamlined nearshoring solutions, offering access to a pool of top-tier technology professionals from Latin America.
Teilur Talent vs. Arc.Dev: Exploring the Alternative Solutions
Teilur Talent and Arc.Dev are leading players in remote talent acquisition, but their approaches are different. Arc.Dev specializes in connecting clients globally for short-term, project-based work, making it a versatile nearshore outsourcing company. In contrast, Teilur Talent, one of the top IT staff augmentation companies, focuses on long-term, full-time roles that are critical for companies seeking deeper team integration.
Transparent, fair pricing
While Arc.Dev determines pricing after final interviews and offers technical interviewing services as part of its package, Teilur Talent stands out for its upfront and transparent pricing. This approach is especially beneficial for companies that budget for full-stack developer hiring.
Imagine you were to hire a developer with Teilur Talent. They give you the potential ranges of salary, and once you are ready to make an offer Teilur Talent will give you insights into what is a competitive offer. The best part is that they will tell you how much of that payment they keep, and how much goes directly to the developer, and this margin never exceeds 20%. This is one of the most disruptive approaches Teilur Talent implements.
We have reviewed different well-known sites where users leave their comments, on G2, for example, Arc.Dev has a 4.8 star rating with 17 reviews. G2 allows us to see the opinions of each user both positive and negative. Although they rated it with 4 stars, they described some situations that were not to their total liking. These were related to the possibility that Arc.Dev is inflating the salaries of candidates in their system, and also about the high costs that companies might incur when hiring with Arc.Dev.
In Trust Pilot, Arc.Dev has 4.4 stars with 136 reviews, highlighting the diverse opinions about the service, the candidate selection and interviewing process, time management, and the monitoring Arc. Dev to the candidates who decide to register on the platform and apply for a job, as well as the follow-up they provide to clients once they hire them.
Our thoughts on the pricing structure of Toptal
While it's not possible for us to find details about how much of what a client pays ultimately goes to a candidate, we believe clients looking for transparent and straightforward pricing may want to look at other alternatives.
Our opinion is that if they are charging a client more than $12,000 monthly for a developer, they should at the very least be giving $9,600 to the candidate, but it's likely that it's even less than that.
What Hiring Managers Should Ask Before Choosing a Talent Partner
Before partnering with any talent provider — whether Toptal, Teilur, or others — hiring managers should consider asking the following key questions:
- What percentage of the fee actually goes to the talent?
- Are replacement or satisfaction guarantees included in the contract?
- How are regional salary benchmarks determined?
- Is there full transparency in how rates are broken down?
- What is the long-term cost difference between hiring directly and through a platform?
These questions can help businesses make informed decisions and ensure that pricing aligns with both market realities and ethical compensation practices.
The right candidate for your team
Arc.Dev offers a fast turnaround in candidate matching, which is suitable for companies that need technical talent immediately. However, Teilur Talent excels at recruiting full-stack developers, ensuring that candidates are not only a technical fit, but also a cultural fit with the company's values.
Similarities and Differences Between Arc.Dev and Teilur Talent
Arc.Dev and Teilur Talent both operate in the remote talent acquisition space, but address different needs - Arc.Dev for short-term, freelance roles and Teilur Talent for long-term, culturally aligned positions. While both offer technical interviewing services, Teilur Talent's approach to full-stack developer recruitment is more comprehensive and focused on long-term integration.
When would you recommend my company choose Arc.Dev or Teilur Talent?
Choose Arc.Dev for short-term, project-based remote talent acquisition, especially if you need quick access to a global talent pool. Choose Teilur Talent, a leading nearshore outsourcing company, for longer-term engagements where cultural fit and deep integration into your team is essential.
What are the key benefits of working with Teilur Talent vs. Arc.Dev?
As a leading company in IT staff augmentation, Teilur Talent differentiates itself through its commitment to transparent pricing, prioritizing cultural alignment, and fostering long-term partnerships. This approach is especially beneficial for organizations aiming to develop stable and cohesive technology teams, emphasizing the importance of deep integration and shared goals.
Teilur Talent's Approach to Payroll, Compliance and Recruiting
Teilur Talent streamlines the hiring process by managing payroll, compliance, and recruitment for full-time roles. This full-service approach offers companies the support they need to simplify their remote hiring practices, ensuring a smooth and efficient pathway to building their teams.
How does Teilur Talent ensure better talent retention than Arc.Dev?
Teilur Talent prioritizes long-term cultural fit and offers full-time positions, which increases the loyalty and commitment of remote workers. This approach is particularly effective in retaining top technical talent compared to Arc.Dev's freelance model.
Conclusion
When it comes to remote talent acquisition, Arc.Dev and Teilur Talent serve different needs. Arc.Dev is ideal for quick, freelance technical talent, while Teilur Talent is the nearshore outsourcing company of choice for long-term, integrated technical team development. Your decision should be based on your project needs, desired level of talent integration, and the type of technical roles you are trying to fill.
